Friday, May 8, 2009

When word call.

Just want the scientist's research application rausschicken finally, since the phone is ringing. It reports: a journalist. Now would be a Sprechomat help the researcher - Patrick Honecker from the University of Cologne FGQ knows who "frequently given answers."

 


There are no stupid questions, only stupid answers, says the vernacular. This is wrong! There are questions that are normally not be expected, not even journalists. Who on a permanent basis as to remain cool, only has a chance. He needs a range of answers that everyone - scientists and science managers - always use them.

If you are still not long thereafter, it means nothing. Sometime words begin their toxic effect. The only question is when you have to be the case.


FOUND IN ...

DUZ

The independent university magazine
Issue 05/2009


Contents
Heft bestellen
www.duz.de


At the beginning it does not hurt yet, repeating the same innocent questions can be heard. Only with prolonged occupation is growing recognition that the Asker will be exchanged - the questions are not unfortunately.

The - venerable dignity - Scharnstein profiled the scientific and academic journalists is a small heap. The bulk of those newspapers, radio and television, with stories from the College must fill out, seems only to be seconded. During probation: climb into the exciting topics possible.

In order for an encounter with journalists to be armed, which the workers of the tertiary education system as a collection of commonly boring pedant view (which of course can also sometimes true), I have a catalog loveless answers zusammengestellt.

Why should you use it? Automated responses protect your intellectual capacity for the things that really are important, for example, the own peer group to impress.

No comments:

Post a Comment